Legal Opinion
State v. Salazar
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided January 23, 2007No. 29,456PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Justice.
{1} Defendant Raul Salazar appeals his conviction of criminal sexual penetration of a minor under the age of thirteen, contrary to NMSA 1978, § 30-9-11(0(1) (2001, prior to 2003 amendment). Defendant appeals from a memorandum opinion issued by the Court of Appeals, which affirmed the district court’s finding that Defendant was given adequate time to prepare his defense. State v. Salazar, No. 24,465 (N.M.Ct.App. Aug. 26, 2005). On appeal, Defendant contends that his constitutional rights to present a meaningful defense and to have effective assistance of counsel were…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. RojoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. ArrendondoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. MorelandNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. AragonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. HillNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.