Legal Opinion

State v. Hill

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 2008No. 27,401PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WECHSLER, Judge.

{1} This appeal arises following a jury verdict finding Defendant Stanley Bryant Hill guilty of one count of criminal sexual penetration. Defendant’s appeal requires us to consider whether NMSA 1978, § 30-1-9(B) (1963), bars the State from prosecuting charges that were filed and dismissed in 1989. We conclude that Section 30-1-9 is a tolling statute, rather than a statute of limitations, and that it does not independently limit the time period within which prosecution must commence. We also address State v. Chouinard, 96 N.M. 658, 634 P.2d 680 (1981), and-the district…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. CamposNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. LuceroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. ChouinardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. DuarteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. State v. KerbyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schultz v. Pojoaque Tribal Police DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. PadillaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. State v. PadillaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2025
  4. State v. PerkinsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API