Epstein v. Brook
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Bubling, C. C. J. and S. C. C.
This is an action in ejectment. Motion has been made by the plaintiff to strike out the answer filed by the defendant in the above stated cause upon “the ground that the allegations contained in the same are not true in fact and sham; and on' the further ground that as to the other allegations contained in the answer, they are frivolous.” In support of the motion, affidavits were resorted to. Supreme Court rules 80 and 81; N. J. S. A. Tit. 2. Counter-affidavits were filed in support of the opposition to the motion. Supreme Court rule 80. The complaint has been…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Louis Kamm, Inc. v. FlinkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Jaeger v. NaefSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Torricelli v. SebastiniSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Kruger v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
- Goldin v. Universal Indemnity InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
3Cited by2 opinions
- Powell v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
- Cabinet v. ShapiroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952