Legal Opinion
Haymes v. Holzemer
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 9, 1981No. L-80-400PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConnors, P.J.
This cause comes upon appeal from the granting of a motion for summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs-appellees by the Common Pleas Court of Lucas County, Ohio.
This cause of action arises from the billing procedure employed by the Board of Lucas County Commissioners for sewer service. Sewer charges were levied on certain landowners, the appellees herein, pursuant to County Resolutions 98, 99 and 100. Two types of charges are in issue. The first is a “tap-in” fee in the amount of $250 per dwelling unit. The second is a “user” charge in the amount of $132 per year per dwelling unit. Both…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Contractors & Builders Ass'n v. City of DunedinSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Apodaca v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
- State Ex Rel. Gordon v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- Bronaugh v. R. & E. Dredging Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
- Turley v. North Huntingdon Township Municipal AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kirchner v. GiebinkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Handy v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Drillex, Inc. v. Lake County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Eye-Will Dev., Inc. v. Lake County, Unpublished Decision (12-1-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006