Legal Opinion

Vig v. Nix Project II Partnership

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 5, 2009No. 1 CA-CV 08-0112PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWANN, Judge.

¶ 1 This case requires us to determine whether the superior court properly granted summary judgment against a buyer pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) § 33-422 (Supp.2008). 1 Finding no error, we affirm.

¶ 2 We hold that an affidavit of disclosure is properly served pursuant to the statute when it is furnished to the buyer at least seven days before closing, regardless whether the buyer acknowledges receipt. We also hold that an affidavit of disclosure is substantively adequate pursuant to A.R.S. § 33-422(F) when the information provided places the buyer on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Valley National Bank of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Phoenix Baptist Hospital & Medical Center, Inc. v. AikenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. National Bank of Arizona v. ThrustonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. GM Development Corp. v. Community American Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass'n v. KitchukovCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. VERMA v. StuhrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. Nina Alley v. Pima County, Pima County Attorney's Office, Laura ConoverCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2026
  3. PennyMac Loan Services LLC v. MelbyeDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
  4. Peoria 44 v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  5. Universal Services of America LP v. MazzonDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API