Legal Opinion

Carl v. State

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 2, 2008No. COA07-1288PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Judge.

I. Procedure

The State of North Carolina, through the North Carolina Teachers’ and State Employees’ Comprehensive Major Medical Plan, a/k/a The State Health Plan (“SHP”) (collectively the “State”), offered certain current and retired North Carolina employees Long Term Care (“LTC”) Benefits’ under a contract of insurance with MedAmerica Insurance Company (“MedAmerica”). Plaintiffs are two North Carolina State employees who seek to represent a class of state employees, retired state employees, and retired local government employees who contend that certain representations by SHP…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Corum v. University of North CarolinaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Whitfield v. GilchristSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Kaleel Builders, Inc. v. AshbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Newberne v. Department of Crime Control & Public SafetySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Frye v. Brunswick County Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2009
  2. Richmond County Board of Education v. CowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Sandhill Amusements, Inc. v. Sheriff of Onslow CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  4. Cox v. RoachCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. Sunapee Difference, LLC v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API