Legal Opinion
Parker v. Zale Corp.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided March 29, 2012No. 2:09-CV-287PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LEON JORDAN, District Judge.
This civil action is before the court for consideration of “Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment” [doc. 13]. Plaintiff has filed a response [doc. 25], and defendant has submitted a reply [doc. 29]. Oral *676argument is unnecessary, and the motion is ripe for the court’s determination.
Plaintiff has filed suit pursuant to the Tennessee Human Rights Act (“THRA”), Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 4-21-101 et seq., for alleged discrimination, hostile work environment, and retaliation based upon her age. For the reasons that follow, the motion will be granted, and this…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Moates v. Hamilton CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2013
- Womack v. Brown-Forman Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2012
- Harris v. WesleyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2024
- Jacobi v. Robertson County, TennesseeDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023