Legal Opinion

Moates v. Hamilton County

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided September 4, 2013No. Case No. 1:11-CV-00293PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HARRY S. MATTICE, JR., District Judge.

Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed jointly by Defendants Hamilton County, Tennessee, the Hamilton County Register of Deeds Office (hereinafter “Deeds office”), and Pam Hurst. (Doc. 25). The Court has considered Defendants’ Motion (Doc. 25), Plaintiffs Response (Doc. 30), and Defendants’ Reply (Doc. 32), as well as the accompanying evidence. For the reasons stated herein, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment will be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

I. BACKGROUND

For the purpose of summary judgment, the Court…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. B&S Transport, Inc. v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2016
  2. Abbott v. Austal USA, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2025
  3. Abbott v. Austal USA, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2025
  4. Abbott v. Austal USA, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2025
  5. Abbott v. Austal USA, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2024

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API