Legal Opinion
Womack v. Brown-Forman Corp.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided September 25, 2012No. Case No. 4:10-cv-44PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*650 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HARRY S. MATTICE, JR., District Judge.
Before the Court are Defendant BrownForman Corporation’s (“BFC”) Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages (Doc. 31), Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment (Docs. 37, 44), and Motions in Li-mine filed by both parties (Docs. 58, 60, 62, 64, 66, 70, 75). BFC’s Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages (Doc. 31) is GRANTED.
The Court has considered Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment, as well as Plaintiffs Response (Doc. 55) and Defendants’ Reply (Doc. 56), as well as the accompanying evidence. For the reasons discussed herein, the Court…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Blank v. Nationwide CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020