Legal Opinion

B.E.O. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 15, 1989No. 89-1022PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This matter is before the court upon a petition for habeas corpus or mandamus and, in effect, an amended petition for mandamus.

B.E.O. was put into detention for a delinquent act and adjudicated a delinquent. At a dispositional hearing the trial judge received from H.R.S. a pre-disposi-tional report which, in accordance with section 39.09(3)(e) Florida Statutes (1988 Supp.), provides a list of three options, in order of preference, of programs in which the child may be placed. The statute requires the judge to rank the options in the order preferred by the court. In this case…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. v. McGregorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. D.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERVICES v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. CMT v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Dept. of Health & Rehab. Serv. v. RwkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. R.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Dept. of Health & Reh. Serv. v. RsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API