Legal Opinion
D.M. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 9, 1989No. 88-672PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOSHORN, Judge.
A dispositional hearing was scheduled and a pre-disposition report ordered as a result of the juvenile’s plea. After receiving the report, containing three options for placement programs pursuant to § 39.09(3)(e), Florida Statutes (1987), the court “requested” the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services to amend to include in the report another or fourth option for commitment placement. The juvenile moved to strike the fourth option, contending the court was without authority to request HRS to amend its placement options to include additional alternatives. The court…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. v. McGregorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
3Cited by7 opinions
- B.E.O. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Dept. of Health & Rehab. Serv. v. RwkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- B.J.M. v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- MM v. KordaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- BEO v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.