Legal Opinion

R.P. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 25, 1989No. 89-2032PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner, a child, has been in secure detention for more than five days after being committed to the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, contrary to section 959.12, Florida Statutes and seeks a writ of habeas corpus. The State’s response concedes that the child has not been placed within the time limit provided, but contends that none of the designated placement options are immediately *544available. In B.E.O. v. State, 544 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) this court held that section 959.12 is mandatory and the child must be removed from detention within five days, therefore the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. B.E.O. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dept. of Health & Reh. Serv. v. RsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. In the Interest of A.B.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. R.L. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. RP v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API