Legal Opinion
State v. Nelson, Ca2007-11-046 (2-9-2009)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 9, 2009No. CA2007-11-046PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Arntanaro Nelson, initiated this appeal, asserting that his criminal conviction from the Clinton County Court of Common Pleas should be dismissed because his right to a speedy trial was violated.
{¶ 2} Appellant avers in his single assignment of error that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss when more than 90 days had elapsed between his arrest and trial.
{¶ 3} Appellate review of speedy-trial issues involves a mixed question of law and fact. State v. High, 143 Ohio App.3d 232, 242,2001-Ohio-3530. A reviewing court must give due deference to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. SanchezOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Brecksville v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. ShabazzOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. RedelmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. FisherOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. DeanOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.