Watson v. Mahan
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Vigo Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
Suit for specific performance of a contract for the conveyance of real estate. The complaint alleged that the contract was by parol; that it was partly executed by possession taken, purchase-money paid, and improvements made.
The answer consisted of the general denial, and several special paragraphs, stating the facts of the case differently from the statement in the complaint, and showing argumentatively that there was not a contract made and partly executed, as alleged in the complaint. These special paragraphs amounted severally to the general denial of the contract upon which the plaintiff…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ash v. DaggyIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
- Atkinson v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
- Brewer v. ThorpIndiana Supreme Court · 1852
- Trustees of the Wabash & Erie Canal v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wallace v. LongIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Roehl v. HaumesserIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Selle v. SelleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- Bryson v. McShaneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
- Austin v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.