Ash v. Daggy
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Putnam Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtStuart, J.
Bill in chancery to enforce a specific performance of a parol contract for the sale of land.
Ash agreed verbally with Baggy to sell him twenty-nine acres of land for 700 dollars, to be paid for when the latter sold his pork.
The parol contract was made February 1,1847. There was no part payment of the purchase-money. It does not appear that Ash ever delivered possession. When applied to for that purpose, he declined doing so, assigning as a reason that it was under lease until the middle of March following. Baggy took possession in March, 1847; whether with or without the consent of Ash does…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ocean Ins. v. FieldsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1841
- Dougherty v. HumpstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1829
3Cited by10 opinions
- Burt v. BowlesIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Guraly v. TENTAIndiana Court of Appeals · 1956
- Cincinnati, Bluffton & Chicago Railroad v. WallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Watson v. MahanIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- Waymire v. WaymireIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.