Legal Opinion

State v. Aguilar-Ramos

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 12, 2017No. 130748629; A157293PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTookey, J.

Defendant, who was convicted of fourth-degree assault and resisting arrest after a guilty plea, argues that the trial court erred in imposing $2,663 in restitution. The judgment of conviction was entered on November 13, 2013, but restitution was not determined until June 4, 2014. On appeal, defendant raises two assignments of error. In his first assignment of error, defendant asserts that the trial court erred in determining that there was “good cause” to impose restitution beyond the 90-day timeline established by ORS 137.106(1)(a). In his second assignment of error, defendant argues that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ArwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. State v. BiscottiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. LandrethCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. CondonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GallegosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. State v. HalfmoonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. State v. RiekerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API