Legal Opinion

State v. Arwood

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 16, 1980No. 78-201 C CA 15598PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for first degree robbery. He contends he was denied the right to a speedy trial as provided in the interstate agreement on detainers, codified in ORS 135.775. We agree and reverse.

In January, 1979, defendant resided at Deuel Vocational Institute, a California correctional facility. The district attorney for Klamath County lodged a detain-er against him on January 9, 1979. On January 11, defendant signed a notice of place of imprisonment and request for disposition of indictments, informations or complaints, as provided by ORS 135.775. That statute required…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Utterback v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Harrington v. DIST. CT. IN AND FOR COUNTY OF MORGANSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  3. State v. ChadwickOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  4. State Ex Rel. Wickliffe v. Judge of the Criminal CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. David Andrew Birdwell v. Jack Skeen, Jr., Criminal District Attorney of Smith County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  2. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. State v. FergusonOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. State v. WaltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  5. State v. BiscottiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API