State v. Landreth
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
ROSENBLUM, S. J.
Defendant was convicted of unauthorized use of a vehicle, ORS 164.135, and, as part of his sentence, was required to pay $1,196.49 in restitution. On appeal, defendant asserts that the trial court erred in imposing restitution because, pursuant to ORS 137.106(l)(b), the court was required to determine restitution within 90 days of entry of the judgment of conviction and lacked “good cause” to extend the time beyond 90 days. In this case, the court held the restitution hearing 98 days after the entry of the judgment of conviction. Defendant also makes several other arguments…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. BiscottiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. MurrellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BeckhamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. Aguilar-RamosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. CondonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. HalfmoonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020