Legal Opinion
Daneshvar v. Graphic Technology, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided December 23, 1998No. 97-2304-JWLPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
In this action, plaintiff Bijan Daneshvar claims that defendant Graphic Technology, Inc. failed to promote him on the basis of his race and national origin and terminated his employment in retaliation for engaging in protected activity, all in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and the Kansas Act Against Discrimination (KAAD), K.S.A. § 44-1001 et seq. 1 Plaintiff also claims that defendant violated the notification provisions of the…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Aramburu v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Robinson v. City and County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- Daneshvar v. Graphic Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Leidel v. Ameripride Services, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Aquilino v. University of KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Wirtz v. Kansas Farm Bureau Services, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.