Legal Opinion

Haney v. Beaton

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 28, 1943PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

The defendant, who was engaged in the business of raising, harvesting and marketing cranberries and interested in acquiring cranberry bogs, employed the plaintiff, a dealer in real estate, on May 7, 1937, to procure for him the cranberry bog property owned by Ware Brothers at a price satisfactory to him. He was to pay her the usual commission. The defendant had been familiar with the property since 1930, and had endeavored since 1936, through a firm of brokers, to secure it but his efforts had been unsuccessful. Within a few days after her employment began, the plaintiff secured a written…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Moss v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Codman v. BeaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Holton v. ShepardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Kacavas v. DiamondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Cohen v. AmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. London Clothes, Ltd. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  2. Corleto v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  3. Toy v. GreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. Libby v. Ivers & Pond Piano Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  5. Green v. TaintorMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API