Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Rappold

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 15, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

This, like Matter of Jackson (138 Misc. 167), decided herewith, is an application by a corporate fiduciary to settle its account, in connection with which a determination is- sought that such fiduciary is required by the provisions of testator’s will to act in a dual capacity, consequently entitling it to double commissions.

The views of the court on the general subject and the determina*164tions on which it rehes in attaining a result contrary to petitioner’s prayer have been so fully detailed in Matter of Jackson (supra) that their present repetition would be a labor of superogation.

Th…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts McAlpineNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. In re the Estate of AbrahamsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  3. Leask v. BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  4. In re the Estate of JacksonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of GrauerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  2. In re the Estate of GregoryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  3. In re Empire Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  4. In re the Estate of CoreNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API