In re the Estate of Rappold
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
This, like Matter of Jackson (138 Misc. 167), decided herewith, is an application by a corporate fiduciary to settle its account, in connection with which a determination is- sought that such fiduciary is required by the provisions of testator’s will to act in a dual capacity, consequently entitling it to double commissions.
The views of the court on the general subject and the determina*164tions on which it rehes in attaining a result contrary to petitioner’s prayer have been so fully detailed in Matter of Jackson (supra) that their present repetition would be a labor of superogation.
Th…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts McAlpineNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- In re the Estate of AbrahamsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
- Leask v. BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- In re the Estate of JacksonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Estate of GrauerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
- In re the Estate of GregoryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
- In re Empire Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- In re the Estate of CoreNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933