Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Grauer

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 14, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

This is an application to compel an administrator c. t. a. to account. The petitioner is a remainderman under the will. The appointment and qualification of the administrator on November 25, 1905, are admitted, as is the fact that no accounting has ever been made respecting his acts in that capacity. No release by the remainderman of his right to demand an accounting is alleged or shown. It follows that his rights to the desired relief cannot be successfully denied, since it is primary that mere lapse of time will not bar his demand in this respect. (Matter of Beard, 141 Misc. 888,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In re Brooklyn Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1929
  2. In Re the Accounting of Brooklyn Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Lewis v. . HoweNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Hodgman v. CobbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  5. In re WhiteNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Construction of the Will of DouglasNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
  2. In re the Estate of RapleeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  3. In re the Estate MannaraNew York Surrogate's Court · 2004
  4. In re the Estate of WolanskiNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  5. In re the Estate of JohnsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API