Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Jackson

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 15, 1930PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

In this case the accountant seeks a determination that, under the terms of the will, the testator contemplated that it should act in a dual capacity, namely, both as executor and as trustee, and that, as a result, it is entitled to commissions in both capacities.

This question is one which is raised in a very large proportion of cases of executorial accounting and is a matter of serious import to the estates of decedents. There is, of course, no question respecting the right of the person administering an estate to commissions on all income received and paid out by him. The sole…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Johnson v. . LawrenceNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. In Re the Accounting of BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Cooke v. . MeekerNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  4. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts McAlpineNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. In Re the Accounting SlocumNew York Court of Appeals · 1901

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of MillerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  2. In re the Estate of BaldwinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  3. In re the Estate of GregoryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  4. In re the Estate of QuinlanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  5. In re the Estate of SloatNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API