Legal Opinion

PR/JSM RIVARA LLC v. Community Redevelopment Agency

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 2009No. B213051PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SUZUKAWA, J.

Appellants 1 petitioned for a writ of mandate to compel respondents Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles (agency) and City of Los Angeles (city) to set aside the September 2007 design guidelines (design guidelines) for the North Hollywood redevelopment project area (project area). The trial court denied the requested relief and entered a judgment of dismissal. Finding no error, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

Appellants are private developers of several properties located within the project area. The project area has been subject to a community redevelopment plan…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. San Francisco Airports CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Move Eden Housing v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  2. Move Eden Housing v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  3. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API