Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Civil Service Board

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 15, 1999No. 9610008072; CA A98841PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Appellant has moved to “clarify” our disposition because “[i]t seems the parties are unable to agree on what the Court of Appeals intended to happen next.” We allow the motion. Our disposition “Reversed and remanded,” Johnson v. Civil Service Board, 161 Or App 489, 506, 985 P2d 854 (1999), is clarified and modified to read: “Reversed and remanded with instructions to issue writ reversing decision of Civil Service Board and determining petitioner’s entitlement to ancillary relief, including reinstatement and restitution, pursuant to ORS 34.100.”

Motion granted; disposition modified to read:…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. Civil Service BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Salosha, Inc. v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Rogers MacHinery, Inc. v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Scherzinger v. Portland Custodians Civil Service BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API