Legal Opinion

Stroud v. Elliott

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided September 9, 1994No. 2180PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

After reviewing the Petition for Rehearing in this case, it is ordered that the opinion heretofore filed, Opinion No. 2180, filed May 9, 1994, be withdrawn and the attached opinion be substituted. The Petition for Rehearing is granted without oral argument.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

*244fa/ C. Tolbert Goolsbv. Jr., J.

C. Tolbert Goolsby, Jr.

/s/ Carol Connor. J.

Carol Connor'

Columbia, South Carolina

August 15, 1994

Goolsby, Judge:

In this action to quit title and for trespass, Ileen M. Stroud, Sarah Katherine Stroud Bryant, and Faye Stroud Wilson (the Strouds) sought damages against A. Ethel and Eunice…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. O'Neal v. BowlesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Carrigg v. BlueCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Sparrow v. Toyota of Florence, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. WileyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Wimberly v. BarrCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API