Legal Opinion

Wimberly v. Barr

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 1, 2004No. 3817PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURETON, A.J.:

John D. Wimberly brought this action against Wayne Barr; Steve Rutland and Roy Rutland, doing business as South Willow Logging and Roy Rutland- Logging; and Southeastern Forest Products, Inc., for cutting timber on his property without permission. The jury awarded actual and punitive damages. After post-trial motions, the trial judge decreased the amount of actual damages to equal three times the value of the timber pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. § 16-11-615 (2003) 1 (the timber statute). The punitive damages were not altered. Wimberly appeals the reduction of the actual damages. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Clark v. CantrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Gamble v. StevensonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Paschal v. State Election CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  5. Charleston County Parks & Recreation Commission v. SomersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Parker v. Spartanburg Sanitary Sewer DistrictCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Madden v. Petland Summerville LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022
  3. Ralph v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API