Legal Opinion
Pastor v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 9, 1940PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
This is an action at law for treble damages under the Federal Anti-Trust Laws. 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1 and 15. In his amended complaint the plaintiff alleges that he is the owner of a patent which gives him the right to make, use and vend a certain device known as an automatic repertory dial device, which is designed to be attached to what is commonly known as a dial telephone. The device reduces the number of manipulations of the selecting mechanism in calling a number and furnishes a means by which certain pre-selected call stations may each be signalled by a single…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bluefields S. S. Co. v. United Fruit Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
- Seaboard Terminals Corp. v. Standard Oil Co. of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Seaboard Terminals Corporation v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938
- La Chappelle v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1936
- Rossman v. Pullman Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1936
3Cited by21 opinions
- Nifty Foods Corporation v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. And Pet IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Grip-Pak, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Waldron v. British Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Steiner v. 20th Century-Fox Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Fleischer v. A.A.P., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.