Legal Opinion

Solo v. Chrysler Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 9, 1977No. Docket 25558PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion

On Rehearing

2Per curiam

This matter is before the Court on rehearing. Plaintiff sought to vacate a redemption order issued by the Workmen’s Compensation Bureau. The trial court granted summary judgment for the defendant ruling that a redemption order is a final determination that cannot be vacated except for fraud. Johnston’s Administrator v United Airlines, 23 Mich App 279, 285; 178 NW2d 536 (1970). We reversed, holding that,

"a court exercising equity jurisdiction may set aside a workmen’s compensation redemption order where the claimant has a meritorious claim for greater compensation than he has…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnston's Administrator v. United AirlinesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Solo v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Solo v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Solo v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Harrington v. BROWN BROTHERSMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Solo v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Solo v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API