Legal Opinion

Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Wiseman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 15, 1936No. 4-4394PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

The appellant filed its complaint in the Pulaski Chancery Court to enjoin the appellee from collecting a sales tax on commodities bought by the Highway Department. In the beginning, the purpose of the suit was to obtain credit for severance tax laid and collected upon these same commodities, but that phase of the suit has been abandoned by appellant upon the theory that Arkansas State Highway Commission is a branch or arm of the State government and that as such the tax should not be imposed for the reason the ultimate result is “that of taking money from,one pocket and putting it in another”

T…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Nelson Bros.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  2. Sparling v. Refunding BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  3. City of Covington v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  4. State Ex Rel. Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  5. Blackwood v. SibeckSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moore v. Pleasant Hasler Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1937
  2. McCarroll, Commr. of Rev. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API