State Ex Rel. Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Smith
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtLeedy, J.
Original proceeding in mandamus to compel respondent, the State Auditor, to audit an invoice or bill for forty tons of road sand purchased by Missouri Highway Commission from relator. Upon the filing of relator’s petition, respondent waived the issuance and service of our alternative writ, accepted said petition as and’ for such writ, and made return thereto. Whereupon relator filed what is denominated a “motion for judgment notwithstanding respondent’s return.” The facts are not in dispute, and the issues made by the pleadings are issues of law. The road sand mentioned was purchased at…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Monamotor Oil Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Standard Oil Co. v. BrodieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Wiseman v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- State v. Parker Distilling Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- Independent School District, Class A, No. 1 v. PfostIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Leonard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- American Bridge Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- City of Plymouth v. ElsnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Centerre Bank of Crane v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.