Blackwood v. Sibeck
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The question involved in this appeal is the liability of the -counties of the State for the payment of the license fee, for the issuance of the tag or plate, which is placed upon motor vehicles -owned by the counties, and used exclusively for public purposes.
In -support of the contention that counties are not required to pay this license fee, we -are cited to- that portion of article 16, § 5, of the 'Constitution, which reads as follows: “* * * Provided, further, that the following property shall be exempt from taxation: Public property used exclusively for public purposes.”
In further support…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stanley v. GatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Fort Smith v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
- State v. PrestonOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. HandlinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Floyd v. Miller Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Washington County v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
- Fort Smith v. WatsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- McCarroll, Commr. of Rev. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. WisemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
- Washington Cty. Bd. of TsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016