Legal Opinion
Woolf v. Clarke
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 21, 1911No. Civ. No. 886PublishedCited by 4 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment against defendant, taken within sixty days from its entry, in an action upon a promissory note. Plaintiff recovered judgment, and the appeal is by defendant.
In substance the following .are the facts: On the seventh day of November, 1906, the defendant gave her promissory note to C. F. Necklaus for $1,000, payable sixty days after date, with interest at the rate of six per cent per month from maturity until paid. Subsequently, on January 5,1907, C. F. Necklaus duly indorsed this note and transferred it to the First National Bank of Monterey as collateral…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Union Trust Co. v. RigdonIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
- McArthur v. MageeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by4 opinions
- Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Traders Bank v. WilcoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Evans v. Robert Marsh Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- First National Bank of Tustin v. LandrethCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932