Legal Opinion

La Rossa v. Forte Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 1927No. Appeal 298PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

The decree requires defendants to take down their garage and to pay $300 damages. They own and occupy a dwelling with a storeroom or office (the storeroom was vacant at the time of the trial) on a lot at the southwest corner of Woodstock and Mifflin Streets, containing 53 feet on Woodstock Street and 17 feet on Mifflin Street. On the Woodstock side, in the rear of the dwelling, there was a yard 8 x 17 feet, the only open space on the lot. On that space they built a one-story garage against the protest of the plaintiff and are using it notwithstanding that they were ordered…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Phillips v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Hohl v. ModellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Rhodes v. DunbarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  4. Houghton v. KendrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Wilson v. BlaineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DeBlasiis v. Bartell & OlivetoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Beckershoff Et Ux. v. BombaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API