Legal Opinion
Simonetta v. Viad Corp.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 29, 2007No. 56614-8-I, 57011-1-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
151 P.3d 1019 (2007)
Joseph A. SIMONETTA and Janet E. Simonetta, a married couple, Appellants,
v.
VIAD CORPORATION f/k/a The Dial Corporation individually and as successor to Griscom Russell Company, Respondents, and
Saberhagen Holdings, Inc., as successor to Tacoma Asbestos Company and The Brower Company; Bartells Asbestos Settlement Trust; Aqua-Chem, Inc., individually and as successor to Cleaver-Brooks Company; Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation; General Electric Company; General Refractories Company; Imo Industries, Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to De Laval Turbine, Inc.;…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Hansen v. FriendWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Lockwood v. a C & S, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
- Bernethy v. Walt Failor's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
- Rastelli v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Simonetta v. Viad Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Simonetta v. Viad Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- Payne v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Rosengren v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.