Yancey v. Lamar-Rankin Drug Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Garnishment. Before Judge Brand. Gwinnett superior court. January 30, 1912.
1Opinion of the CourtFish, C. J.
1. Under the “sale-in-bulk” act (Civil Code, § 3226), the following transactions are declared to be fraudulent and void as against creditors of the vendor, when the provisions of the act are not complied with: (1) Every sale or transfer of a stock of goods, wares, or merchandise in bulk, (2) or of substantially the entire business theretofore conducted by the vendor of such a stock, (3) or every sale or transfer of such a stock out of the usual or ordinary course of business or trade of the vendor.
2. The act is in derogation of the common law, and of the right to alienate property without…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cooney, Eckstein & Co. v. SweatSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Fairfield Shoe Co. v. OldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Stovall Co. v. Shepherd Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hotel Equipment Co. v. LiddellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Long Cigar & Grocery Co. v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Schoeppel v. PfannensteilSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- C. M. Miller Co. v. LuncefordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Howell v. HowellTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.