Russell v. Lehman
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtRandolph, J.
This cause was originally pending on appeal without a statement of facts. On motion of appellees, they were permitted to file a statement of facts which had been duly prepared and filed in the trial court. The case is therefore submitted upon transcript, statement of facts, and briefs for both parties.
The appellant seeks a reversal of the trial court’s judgment solely upon the proposition that, after request seasonably made, the trial court failed to file his findings of fact and conclusions of law in that court within the time prescribed by the statute. Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. 1925, arts.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barfield v. EmeryTexas Supreme Court · 1915
- Riley v. AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- Voelkel-Mclain Co. v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Employers' Casualty Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- George v. DupignacCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barry v. BarryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Schultze v. SchultzeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Pantaze v. Fox-Head Spring Beverage Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929