Pantaze v. Fox-Head Spring Beverage Co.

Several errors in the judgment are "apparent upon the face of the record." Article 1837, R.S. 1925. In the first place, it appears in the record that it was by default and rendered on October 2, 1928, the first day of the term of the court to which the suit was brought. The beverage company was not in any event entitled to such a judgment before the second day of that term. Articles 2152 and 2154, R.S. 1925; 34 C.J. 180: 15 R.C.L. 665. In the second place, the court undertook in it to foreclose the lien of the attachment levied on the land and to provide for the sale of the part thereof…