Legal Opinion

People v. Chrysler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 6, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the *487ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 20, 2004 (People v Chrysler, 13 AD3d 550 [2004]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered September 13, 2000, and motion by the respondent to disqualify Michael H. Sussman from representing the appellant on the application for a writ of error coram nobis.

Ordered that the motion is denied; and it is further,

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. People v. StultzNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. People v. ChryslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chrysler v. GuineyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  2. Chrysler v. GuineyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API