Chrysler v. Guiney
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge:
Petitioner Gregory Chrysler, through counsel, filed the instant petition for the writ of habeas corpus (“the Petition” or “Habeas Petition”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his July 2000 conviction. The Court referred the case to the Honorable Magistrate Judge Lisa M. Smith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), who issued a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”), concluding that the Petition should *425be dismissed as untimely. (R & R 14 (Dkt. No. 43).) Petitioner submitted timely objections, again through counsel. (Petitioner’s Objections to R…
2Cases cited98 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Chrysler v. GuineyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Hirsh v. McArdleDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2015
- Cardova v. LavalleyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Anderson v. MartuscelloDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Anthony Santaniello, Jr. v. Commissioner of CorrectionsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.