Legal Opinion
Klamath Pacific Corp. v. Reliance Insurance
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 26, 1997No. 9302944CV; CA A91172PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*407LANDAU, J.
At issue in this case is whether defendant Reliance Insurance Company (Reliance) had a duty to defend plaintiffs Robert Stewart and Klamath Pacific Corporation (Klamath Pacific) in lawsuits brought by former employees of Klamath Pacific. The trial court held that Reliance did owe plaintiffs such a duty to defend in the underlying actions. Reliance appeals.
In February 1990, two former employees of Klamath Pacific, Ballinger and Sutfin, filed actions in federal district court against Klamath Pacific, against Stewart, as principal shareholder and president of Klamath Pacific, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Timberline Equipment Co., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Ledford v. GutoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Cimarron Insurance v. Travelers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1, ETC. v. Mission Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- McLeod v. Tecorp International, Ltd.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Fred Shearer & Sons, Inc. v. Gemini InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- National Union Fire Insurance v. Starplex Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Drake v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Minnis v. Oregon Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Wells' Dairy, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of IllinoisDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.