City of Lindsay v. Mack
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate directed to the City Clerk of the City of Lindsay. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
In this proceeding a peremptory writ of mandate as requested by petitioner was ordered issued from the bench. This opinion is filed to show the grounds of such action by this court.
The proceeding was in mandate to compel the respondent, city clerk of the city of Lindsay, to sign and attest certain municipal bonds proposed to be issued under the act authorizing the incurring of indebtedness by cities, etc., found in statutes of 1901 at page 27.
The only question was whether notice of the election at which the bonds were voted was given for the time required by the provisions of said…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Board of Directors of North Unit Irr. Dist. Gard v. PeckOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Northridge Park County Water District v. McDonellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- People Ex Rel. Skelly v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People Ex Rel. Skelly v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People Ex Rel. Skelly v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953