Legal Opinion · Dissent

People Ex Rel. Skelly v. City of Glendale

California Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1953No. L. A. 22500Published

1Dissent

SCHAUER, J., Dissenting.

I would reverse the judgment. The elections here questioned were special elections. It is fundamental that in special election proceedings the giving of the notice prescribed by statute is jurisdictional. (See Stumpf v. Board of Supervisors (1901), 131 Cal. 364, 368 [63 P. 663, 82 Am.St.Rep. 350] ; People ex rel. McKune v. John B. Weller (1858), 11 Cal. 49, 62 [70 Am.Dec. 754].) The notices which were given did not meet the statutory re*737quirements. This court has no power to lessen the period of notice fixed by the Legislature. The annexation elections were therefore…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stumpf v. Board of Supervisors of San Luis Obispo CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. People ex rel. McKune v. WellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  3. City of Lindsay v. MackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Fostler v. Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API