Legal Opinion

State v. Lindsey

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1972No. State 105PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

The principal issue raised on this appeal is whether the appellant was denied his right to confront a witness whose testimony, as given at the preliminary hearing, was introduced at the trial.

Right to confront witness.

Michael Murphy testified at the preliminary hearing that on the day following the death of Miss Gonzales appellant told him that he had killed a Mexican girl the night before. Murphy did not appear at trial despite the state’s efforts to locate him and compel him to appear. His testimony at the preliminary was read into the record in the presence of the jury. Appellant contends…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. State v. ShoffnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Gaertner v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. DombrowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Roehl v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Leach v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Nabbefeld v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Neely v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
  5. State v. JennaroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API