Legal Opinion

State v. Jennaro

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1977No. 75-795PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The defendant-appellant, James Jennaro, and a co-defendant, Leroy Bell, who is not a party to this appeal, were found guilty, after a trial by jury, of soliciting a female to practice prostitution contrary to sec. 944.32, Stats., and sec. 939.05 (party to a crime). Jennaro was sentenced to a year’s confinement in the House of Correction. Sentence was stayed, and he was placed on probation for two years conditioned on serving the first year under the Huber Law 1 and the payment of a thousand dollar fine.

On this appeal no objection is raised as to the sufficiency of the evidence. It is argued,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Lock v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. DyessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
  3. Coryell v. ConnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  5. Roehl v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API