Legal Opinion

City of Tempe v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1973No. 10758PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■ HOLOHAN, Justice.

The Prudential Insurance Company of America (Prudential) brought an action against the State Tax Commission and The City of Tempe for the return of transaction privilege taxes paid by Prudential pursuant to A.R.S. § 42-1301 et seq. and Tempe City Code § 33-11 et seq. Prudential claimed that it was not required to pay the taxes by reason of A.R.S. § 20-226. After cross-motions for summary judgment, the Maricopa County Superior Court ruled that Prudential was required to pay the state tax, but that A.R.S. § 20-226, subsec. B had preempted Tempe from levying a transaction…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bristor v. CheathamArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  2. United States v. Atlas Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Tower Plaza Investments, Limited v. DeWittArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State Tax Commission v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  5. City of Phoenix v. Phoenix Civic Auditorium & Convention Center Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Town of Chino Valley v. City of PrescottArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Ruiz v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  3. City of Pittsburgh v. Allegheny Valley BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Cave Creek Unified School District v. DuceyArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Hootch Ex Rel. Hootch v. Alaska State-Operated School SystemAlaska Supreme Court · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API