Legal Opinion

Continental Resources, Inc. v. Farrar Oil Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1997No. Civil 960328PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESCHKE, Justice.

[¶ 1] Farrar Oü Company appealed a summary judgment declaring Continental Resources, Inc. may rightfuüy drül a horizontal oü and gas weü through the designated subsurface formation of Farrar’s separate leasehold within a force-pooled spacing unit of the Cedar HiUs-Red River “B” field in Bowman County, North Dakota. We agree with the trial court that the compulsory pooling order authorizes the weü and precludes Farrar’s claim of subsurface trespass. We affirm.

[¶2] Continental holds oü and gas leases on the northwest and southeast quarters of section 17, Township 131 North,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. CromwellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Union Pacific Resources Co. v. Texaco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Nunez v. Wainoco Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  4. Hystad v. Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Slawson v. North Dakota Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Egeland v. Continental Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Gadeco, LLC v. Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Environmental Driven Solutions, LLC v. Dunn CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Pifer v. McDermottNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Come Big or Stay Home, LLC v. EOG Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API