Legal Opinion
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Hupy
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided May 27, 2011No. 2007AP1281-DPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
¶ 1. Attorney Michael F. Hupy appeals from the report and recommendation of the referee, Attorney James J. Winiarski, that he be publicly reprimanded for his professional misconduct and that he be required to pay the full costs of this disciplinary proceeding. In particular, Attorney Hupy challenges the referee's conclusions that he committed three violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys.
¶ 2. After thoroughly reviewing the matter, the court is evenly split as to whether there is a violation of SCR 20:8.4(c) as alleged in Count 1 of the complaint filed by the Office of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Peel v. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against InglimoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Gary W. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2026