Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Laue v. Production Credit Ass'n of Blooming Prairie

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 22, 1986No. CX-86-617, C1-86-652Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partFoley, Judge

I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part. It is my view that as a temporary emergency measure the Farmer-Lender Mediation Act is prospectively constitutional but is not retroactive in its application to the cases on appeal.

1. THE FARMER-LENDER MEDIATION ACT OF 1986, AS A TEMPORARY EMERGENCY MEASURE, IS CONSTITUTIONAL WHEN VIEWED AND APPLIED PROSPECTIVELY.

The temporary emergency Farmer-Lender Mediation Act, 1986 Minn. Laws ch. 398, art. 1, §§ 5-17 (codified as Minn.Stat. §§ 583.20-32), was enacted to help preserve the integrity of the farm economy of Minnesota in light of the present…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Wallace v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. Christensen v. Minneapolis Municipal Employees Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Ridgewood Development Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. State v. OsterlohSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API