National Wildlife Federation v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TRAUGER, District Judge.
Pending before the court is the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint (Docket No. 26), to which the plaintiffs have responded (Docket No. 29), and the defendants have replied (Docket No. 32). For the reasons discussed herein, the defendants’ motion will be granted.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND and PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On September 11, 2002, the Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) issued a jurisdictional determination that the wetlands adjacent to the Upper Cumberland Regional Airport (“UCRA”) were not “waters of the United States,” such as would be necessary to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Sensient Colors, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Florida Wildlife Federation, Inc. v. JacksonDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2012